Vol. 30 No. 2 (2022)
Articles

The Testing Article: A Study on Following Robust Journal Website Updating Protocols

  • Aida Alibek & Dru Horne TME Editors

Published 2025-04-03

Keywords

  • testing

Copyright (c) 2022 Aida Alibek & Dru Horne TME Editors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This short article, consisting of less than 10 words, can be summarized thusly - we should test before updating production.

References

  1. Bishop, J. P. (2012). “She’s Always Been the Smart One. I’ve Always Been the Dumb One”: Identities in the Mathematics Classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), 34–74. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.1.0034
  2. Cai, J. (2022). What Research Says About Teaching Mathematics Through Problem Posing. Éducation et Didactique, 16, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.10642
  3. Campbell, T. G., Boyle, J. D., & King, S. (2020). Proof and argumentation in K-12 mathematics: A review of conceptions, content, and support. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(5), 754–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1626503
  4. Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 401–429.
  5. Dockendorff, M., & Zaccarelli, F. G. (2024). Successfully preparing future mathematics teachers for digital technology integration: A literature review. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 0(0), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2024.2309273
  6. Fitriati, F., Rosli, R., Iksan, Z., & Hidayat, A. (2024). Exploring challenges in preparing prospective teachers for teaching 4C skills in mathematics classroom: A school-university partnership perspectives. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2286812. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2286812
  7. Francisco, J. M. (2022). Supporting Argumentation in Mathematics Classrooms: The Role of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 147–170.
  8. Fukawa-Connelly, T., & Silverman, J. (2015). The Development of Mathematical Argumentation in an Unmoderated, Asynchronous Multi-User Dynamic Geometry Environment. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(4), 445–488.
  9. Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Constructionism (pp. xi, 518). Ablex Publishing.
  10. Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
  11. Huang, Z., Mao, Y., & Zhang, J. (2024). The Influence of Artificial Intelligence Technology on College Students’ Learning Effectiveness from the Perspective of Constructivism—Taking ChatGPT as an Example. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 30, 40–46. https://doi.org/10.54097/y1x3jj43
  12. Inoferio, H. V., Espartero, M., Asiri, M., Damin, M., Chavez, J. V., Inoferio, H. V., Espartero, M., Asiri, M., Damin, M., & Chavez, J. V. (2024). Coping with math anxiety and lack of confidence through AI-assisted Learning. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i5.2228
  13. Jin, J., Walker, J., & Reczek, R. W. (2024). Avoiding embarrassment online: Response to and inferences about chatbots when purchases activate self‐presentation concerns. Journal of Consumer Psychology, jcpy.1414. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1414
  14. Lee, C. D., & Smagorinsky, P. (Eds.). (2000). Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Li, M. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Primary Mathematics Education: Investigating Internal and External Influences on Teacher Adoption. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10515-w
  16. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). An argument for AI in Education.
  17. Martínez-Téllez, R., & Camacho-Zuñiga, C. (2023). Enhancing mathematics education through AI Chatbots in a Flipped Learning Environment. 2023 World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF-GEDC59520.2023.10343838
  18. Mata-Pereira, J., & Da Ponte, J.-P. (2017). Enhancing students’ mathematical reasoning in the classroom: Teacher actions facilitating generalization and justification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9773-4
  19. Mueller, M. F. (2009). The co-construction of arguments by middle-school students. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(2–3), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.06.003
  20. Porayska-Pomsta, K. (2024). A Manifesto for a Pro-Actively Responsible AI in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00346-1
  21. Ramirez, G., Shaw, S. T., & Maloney, E. A. (2018). Math Anxiety: Past Research, Promising Interventions, and a New Interpretation Framework. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1447384
  22. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people.
  23. Russell, S. J., Schifter, D., Bastable, V., Higgins, T., & Kasman, R. (2017). But Why Does It Work? Mathematical Argument in the Elementary Classroom. Heinemann. https://www.heinemann.com/products/e08114.aspx
  24. Sharples, M. (2023). Towards social generative AI for education: Theory, practices and ethics. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2023.2261131
  25. Staples, M. E., Bartlo, J., & Thanheiser, E. (2012). Justification as a teaching and learning practice: Its (potential) multifacted role in middle grades mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(4), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.07.001
  26. Stylianides, A. J., Bieda, K. N., & Morselli, F. (2016). Proof and Argumentation in Mathematics Education Research. In Á. Gutiérrez, G. C. Leder, & P. Boero (Eds.), The Second Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: The Journey Continues (pp. 315–351). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-561-6_9
  27. Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
  28. Van Ness, C. K., & Maher, C. A. (2019). Analysis of the argumentation of nine-year-olds engaged in discourse about comparing fraction models. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 53, 13–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.04.004
  29. Wambsganss, T., Janson, A., Söllner, M., Koedinger, K., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024). Improving Students’ Argumentation Skills Using Dynamic Machine-Learning-Based Modeling (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4861500). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4861500